[Mpls] Clarification needed: Rich people exempted from the second-hand smoke rules?

[Joseph Barisonzi]

I believe that Vicki is wrong. The Council got a legal opinion on that
yesterday. Perhaps on of them could confirm? Private clubs -- like the
Minneapolis club -- are still regulated place of employment. If they
have a license to say -- serve food --





Sorry Vicki -- another "I thought so" which turns out to be conjecture,
and false.


Joseph Barisonzi
Community Knowledge Specialist
CommunityLeader, Inc.
joe at communityleader.com
612-518-5536
 

I don't know if you got the whole picture or not... but (s)he's not
exactly working on all thrusters. - McCoy, "Star Trek IV"

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces at mnforum.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at mnforum.org] On
Behalf Of Victoria Heller
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:08 AM
To: Mpls Forum
Subject: [Mpls] Clarification needed: Rich people exempted from
thesecond-hand smoke rules?

I assume that private, members only clubs are exempt from the air
pollution
rules.  You know, places like The Minneapolis Club -- where all of the
rich
Democrats hang out.

Only the poor and the foot-bound "metrosexuals" will be impacted. Right?

Anyone with a car and some money can circumvent the rules.  Right?

I thought so.

Vicky Heller
North Oaks and Cedar-Riverside

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
mplslist at tcq.net before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see:
http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls at mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls