[Mpls] school closing without a plan
Socialist2001 at cs.com
Socialist2001 at cs.com
Mon Oct 4 16:12:31 CDT 2004
In a message dated 10/4/2004 7:42:15 AM Central Daylight Time,
hoboanne at uslink.net writes:
<< Dorie writes:
The enrollment in the schools have dropped due to people sending their kids
to charter and private schools is my understanding, not due to a census drop
of children. One would assume then, that parents are not satisfied with
the education being given in the public school system... >>
I agree with everything said in the whole paragraph that begins with the
above two sentences. It seems to me that parents are very likely to look for
alternatives to the public schools if their children are not on a college bound
curriculum track. I believe that "white flight," and now "black flight" has more
to do with that than anything else. The district has schools with high
concentrations of inexperienced teachers and high teacher turnover rates, including
most of the "racially isolated" schools, of which 21 of 23 are on the state's
list of poor performing schools. Students are ability-grouped and tracked (put
in separate classrooms for fast, medium, and slow learners) on a part-time
basis for reading instruction as early as Kindergarten.
Why not fix the schools, instead of downsizing the district? The district can
begin to make a quality education accessible to all students by desegregating
probationary teachers (3 years employment or less), stopping unnecessary
layoffs (which would cut teacher turnover rates), and phasing out "low" ability
curriculum tracks. I believe it is possible to untrack the schools without
watering down the college bound curriculum programs which are currently reserved
for only about one-fourth of the district's students.
-Doug Mann, King Field
write-in "Doug Mann" for school board on November 2
www.educationright.com
-
More information about the Mpls
mailing list