[Mpls] A "compromise" re: lawn signs (to Mpls Green Party)

[Socialist2001 at cs.com]

Subj:   Re: [M5DGP] MN statute 211B.02 False claim of support.  

In a message dated 8/16/2005 4:58:08 PM Central Standard Time, 
mncivil at yahoo.com writes: 
> It would be honorable, if inconvenient for Doug to
> respect the party endorsement process by adding
> "member" to his signs and materials but we cannot
> control(other than through legal action which should
> only ever be a last resort used on pressing matters
> imo) what Doug's campaign does or doesn't do. I don't
> know as this rises to the level of being a pressing
> matter.

David, what got Mark Snyder and his pals in the Democratic Party so upset is 
that my sign implies that the green party has a clear position against the 
stadium. My sign says "No new stadium tax without a referendum!" and "Green 
Party" under my name (in much smaller letters on the right margin). 

How about this for a compromise: The Green Party leadership issues a public 
statement saying that my stand against the stadium is incompatible with Green 
Party membership, and expells me from the Green Party. Then I cover up "Green 
Party." Is that a satisfactory proposal?

-Doug Mann