[Mpls] Welcoming Business
gemgram
gemgram at mn.rr.com
Thu Feb 3 09:58:08 CST 2005
Much of what Barb says is absolutely true and the City of Minneapolis has
gained a return on its investment of NRP dollars that makes other City
investments look very, very bad indeed. This is perhaps the source of the
politicians antipathy to NRP. Not only does it empower citizens to believe
they have the ability and can make decisions about their own lives and
communities, but it simply makes politicians look bad and terribly inept in
comparison, because a bunch of supposed "amateurs" do a far better job than
the supposed "professionals" downtown. I say supposed because it is a well
known fact that the community organizations draw on both a professional
staff as well as volunteer professionals that beggar the City
"professionals" by comparison in both its mass (quantity) and in particular
in quality. A Met Council person once commented that a neighborhood's plans
and what they cost sure made the City of Minneapolis' efforts look "awful
weak and lame in comparison".
I truly laughed when I saw a thing about the "professional" City staff going
out to communities to help and direct the well meaning "amateurs" do
community planning and development. The opposite is true! City Hall should
throw open its now locked mental doors and have communities help and direct
the "professional staff" to do community planning and development. A good
example is the SUPPOSED "One Stop Shopping" for development. One Stop
Shopping as conceived in a couple of other Cities is walking in with
community approved plans and a City prepared check list of ALL requirements,
plopping them down on a desk and having the City "professional" put together
all needed material and issue all needed variances, zoning changes, permits
and plan reviews at one "STOP". "ONE STOP" as in ONE time at ONE place.
Minneapolis "One Stop Shopping" presently should be labeled "101 Dalmatians"
every time you turn around there is another puppy with new spots that has to
be accounted for. Just a suggestion for the Mayor, and interested Council
Members, have the true "professionals" in such things, (the people who have
to jump through the hoops and count the puppies), simplify it for you. Have
the contractors and development "Customers", the homeowner or small
businessperson (who have to get through your Gordian knot), redesign it for
you.
While Mayor Rybak was well intentioned the McKenzie report has been used to
take very justifiable calls for simplifying and streamlining City Government
in the exact opposite direction than what was called for. Bureaucrats have
made City Departments even more complicated and less open to citizens than
before. Calls were made for more "openness to communication" from
residents. What was created was a "Communications" czar, a professional
position whose job it was to handle all communication "From" the City, and
to "Spin Doctor" such communication to put it in the best light possible for
the administration. No longer were City employees and police to
"communicate" with residents. In these and several other areas RT Rybak was
well intentioned and was fulfilling pre-election commitments. Unfortunately
his professional staff took well intentioned ideas out into deep water so
they drowned. The problem is not with Mayor Rybak, it is with those who
have been appointed to run the City for him.
The call was not for MCDA to be incorporated into the City bureaucracy, the
call was to have MCDA freed from it. What was needed was to have it run by
community members; not the Council. Calls to change the politicizing of
MCDA decisions were answered by abolishing MCDA and making it an even more
unreachable City Department. Though it is more honest, (the Council can no
longer hide behind the fraud that MCDA was an "independent" organization) it
certainly did not solve any of the problems that were being complained
about.
The problem may also be a City Council that has forgotten that we in
Minneapolis have a "Strong Council-Weak Mayor" system for a reason; so we
will have MORE citizen input into City decisions and policies. The Council,
with all its new members and its infatuation with the new polished young
Mayor, allowed itself to be lead along so that it forgot who has the real
power in Minneapolis. Hopefully, the new Council might change that.. Also,
hopefully the present Mayor (if re-elected) will have gained the wisdom to
replace many of his present appointees with those who have an interest in
making the City more friendly and customer directed, rather than ones who
attempt to insulate the Mayor from the communities. Cut the unnecessary
bureaucracy. That is the way you "Welcome Business". At the present time
there are legitimate developer business-people who say they are not
interested in doing business in Minneapolis because it is to complicated and
costs too much, it has become an "unfriendly" place to do business.
The Mayor is indeed personally open to people and their concerns. The
problem is a staff of "professionals" who insulate him from action to a
degree that is unprecedented in Minneapolis politics. Mayor Sharon Sayles
Belton' office was rightfully criticized for being insulated from the
public. But I am here to tell you her office was a wide open door compared
to how Mayor Rybak's office is run. Even her enemies (such as myself) could
make an appointment, see her, and get some action. Even R.T.'s friends (and
there are many more than me) have trouble getting through his present staff.
Well off of beating the dead horse and back to Barb's post. Barb's post
needs to be corrected, or at least enlarged upon, about a couple of things.
Eat Street was not created by NRP. NRP re-did the Street and facade. The
Asian small business people, through buying up old under priced buildings
and hard-work, had already moved in and redone Nicolett before NRP came
along and put some frills upon it. Also, while AINDC was involved in
changing Franklin Avenue the Indian organization with the greatest input
into that "renaissance" was American Indian Community Development
Corporation. AICDC was directly involved in both the planning and
development from the beginning as an actual "community member", not just as
one more business along the Avenue. AICDC continues in those efforts to
serve as the infrastructure support for Ventura Village as a community
member, not just a business. Much of AICDC's staff actually live in the
community, not just do business in it, so that it is indeed "their"
community.
Barb says, "Everyone is talking about the renaissance on Franklin. That did
not happen without significant citizen involvement or without NRP funds as a
major catalyst." A great deal more than "significant citizen involvement"
was in fact involved. The entire process was citizen originated, citizen
planned, and citizen driven . This area asked to be declared a "National
Disaster Area" because of crime and blight. Seeing that no assistance was
going to be coming the citizens committed to "Help themselves". When the
Cities own marketing documents had written off Franklin Avenue saying the
prospects for ANY development on Franklin is "Bleak", they residents seized
NRP dollars and began to drive the process to change their own community.
Seventy thousand to start the redevelopment planning, and ten thousand to
partner in creating the "Franklin Safety Center", less than a million to
renovate over a hundred homes and build a bunch more. Pretty paltry amounts
to create over a hundred million dollars in development! Almost all the
politicians and administrators have taken credit for the "renaissance", but
the engineers and the driving force was the citizens. I would invite Vicki,
or anyone else, to show us even one instance of the "professional"
politicians making such a wise and profitable use of "our" public dollars.
Could it be "Target", Saks; etc, etc, etc.? Nope, just do not think so.
The Mayor even held his "Re-election" announcement from one of those NRP
projects, the Franklin Art Works. A building where the neighborhood seized
NRP dollars to renovate the old Franklin Avenue Porn Theater into the "NEW
FRANKLIN THEATER" that its hundred year old stained glass proclaims. I
wonder if during his announcement the Mayor pointed out that the "Theater"
was done with NRP dollars by the community residents of a "blighted,
"National Disaster", who had decided to help themselves with NRP dollars;
and not by his office? In his speech did Mayor Rybak thank the Ventura
Village Neighborhood residents for standing in that flood of blight when it
surrounded them all around with drugs and death. I hope so!
Jim Graham,
Ventura Village
"If you board the wrong train it's no use running down the corridor in the
other direction"
More information about the Mpls
mailing list