[Mpls] Re: T-H-E W-I-N-G
Anderson & Turpin
anderson.turpin at visi.com
Thu Feb 3 21:54:45 CST 2005
Carol Becker wrote:
My name is Carol Becker. I am on the Oversight Board for the new Downtown
Library after being treasurer for the referendum campaign, a referendum
supported by over 106,000 Minneapolis residents. And I did vote for the
W-I-N-G.
The Oversight Board could have built a plain box. We could have gotten some
of those precast concrete walls like they use to slap up Wal-Mart's and
other big box retailers. It would have very inexpensive and simply
sheltered the books and nothing more. But it would not have said anything
about Minneapolis. It would not have made our city more beautiful or
interesting. It would not have said anything about who we are. It would
not have been something that someone remembers as a child and brings their
child to see. It would not have inspired discussion and debate. If we had
simply built a plain box, it would have been a huge disservice to our
citizens.
What we have strived to do is to build a building that will be an icon for
our city. Something that truly says something about us. We went out and got
an architect who had previously built another icon (Cesar Pelli built the
Norwest Center, the lit-up builing on the Minneapolis skyline) and who had a
long track record of building buildings which were sensitive to the people
where they were built. (he also designed the Petronis Towers, the tallest
building in the world, in Kuala Lampor). And we spent a lot of time talking
about that "restrained enthusiasm" that characterizes who we are. And how
we wanted something that would both be provocative as well as timeless. A
statement for the City like the spoon and cherry or the IDS. It will be up
to the community to say how well we did, how well we captured who we are in
glass and stone. But we did try.
Mark Anderson replies:
I wish Minneapolis would quit building monuments. I wish the government
would stop spending the taxpayers' money to say something about Minneapolis.
I've been to various libraries hundreds of times, and not once have I had
the desire to look over the building before going inside to find books. Why
can't the government build functional buildings, and leave the beautiful
ones for those who are spending their own money? If the city doesn't get
out of the mindset that it needs luxuries instead of the basics then it will
never get out of its current financial straits. Then Vicky's predictions
will come true, and we'll turn into Detroit. I believe Minneapolis is
moving in the right direction, but when I see comments like the above I
worry whether we can maintain the momentum of more fiscally sound
government. This is not a rich city, so we can't afford to buy trinkets.
Mark V Anderson
Bancroft
More information about the Mpls
mailing list