[Mpls] chipping the trees
mplsgordon2 at aol.com
mplsgordon2 at aol.com
Thu Feb 17 14:11:00 CST 2005
Liz Wielinski wrote:
>From listening to Mike Schmidt the GM for Operations at the MPRB burning is
not the only solution. Apparently if the trees are run through a chipper
the resulting chips are not a viable home for the fungus or the beetles. This
is the method the MPRB is currently employing. The $2.5 million a year that
the Minneapolis Tree Commission recommends for the MPRB forestry budget
would hire more people and buy the equipment (including the chippers) the MPRB
would need to keep the Urban Forest healthy.<
Liz is right; chipping is an alternative to burning, as is using debarkers.
In either case, we have to haul the logs to the equipment, which is noisy
and generates a certain amount of pollution. Then we have to figure out what to
do with the remainder; I suspect we will have a lot more wood chips than we
have flower beds in which to put them. Of course, there is ash left over from
burning, but it's much less in volume and weight.
Burning does work best, and it's the least expensive method. However, I
doubt MPCA, and some citizens, would allow it. So, chipping and/or debarking will
probably be the method.
M. G. Stinnett
Jordan
More information about the Mpls
mailing list