[Mpls] Carl Pohlad's "Contribution" - It's not 1/3 like the Strib
says, but 26% at best
Dann Dobson
dddobson1 at yahoo.com
Sun May 1 23:36:03 CDT 2005
According to Dave Lawless, Finance Director of Hennepin County, the total cost of the new Twins Stadium, on the Rapid Park site, including infrastructure, land acquisition costs, financing and insurance is: $478 million dollars.
In a report he sent to the Hennepin County Board last Tuesday, (and I can provide, if anyone would like a copy), the figures break down as follows:
$125 million - Twins contribution to stadium
$235 million - Hennepin Co. contribution to stadium
$84 million - Land acquisition, infrastructure and site preparation
$34 million - Financing Costs; cost of bonds, tax counsel, insurance
$478 million TOTAL RAPID PARK TWINS - HENNEPIN CO STADIUM COSTS
Thus when the Strib talks about the Twins, "putting up 1/3", they are ONLY TALKING ABOUT THE ACTUAL STADIUM, they are totally ignoring the $118 million in associated costs.
When the associated costs are factored in, the Twins in reality are only contributing 26.15%, while the taxpayers of Hennepin County are paying 73.85%.
This also fails to mention the fact that while Hennepin County Taxpayers are paying almost 3/4rds of the cost of this new stadium; the Twins and the Pohlads will retain both naming rights and any revenues from PSL's or Personal Seat Licenses. Naming rights have recently gone for over $200 million dollars and PSL's for over $50 million (however that is unlikely in the Twins case.) So in reality, if the Twins retain both naming rights and PSL revenue, the teams contribution may be near zero or they may actually make a profit.
The reality is Twins and Pohlad are not putting in anywhere near 1/3rd, or even 1/4 into the stadium upfront. This is another myth the Twins, the Hennepin County Board members who want this deal and the Strib are trying to sell the public.
Dann Dobson
Exrecutive Director - No Stadium tax Coalition
651-227-4376
dddobson1 at yahoo.com
NoStadiumTax at yahoo.com
Tim Bonham <t-bonham at scc.net> wrote:
>I'm somewhat of an agnostic on the stadium deal, but the more I read about
>it the more I'm annoyed with how it's being spun in the media. My biggest
>annoyance? Carl Pohlad's "contribution" of $125m.
Another question on this: will Carl's "contribution" be a
donation, and thus deductible on his taxes? (Like business contributions
to Olympics, etc. have been.) In that case, it isn't really much of a
"contribution" at all -- just payment of money that he would otherwise pay
in taxes.
So if Carl deducts that from his taxes, it means the rest of us pay more
taxes to make that up. Or suffer a loss in services, due to the government
'revenue shortfall'.
So Carl gets to claim he is making a contribution, but actually deducts
that on the back end. And he gets the naming rights, so he makes a profit
of about $50-60 million on the deal. Plus the increase ini value of his
team from the new stadium, and the increased revenue from it.
No wonder a guy this cunning is the richest man in Minnesota!
Tim Bonham, Ward 12, Standish-Ericsson
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at mplslist at tcq.net before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls at mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Mpls
mailing list