[Mpls] Candidates who Question or Equivocate on Smoking Ban are
Defeated?
Psurmak at aol.com
Psurmak at aol.com
Fri Nov 18 17:17:50 CST 2005
The right of privacy is not guaranteed or stipulated in our constitution,
nor do any of my posts claim it is. In fact, the question of whether or not
citizens do, or should, have the right to privacy is often hotly debated and
forms the basis of arguements both for and against issues, such as abortion,
sexual behavior, etc.
My point is not that the right to privacy is guaranteed by our constitution.
Personally I believe that citizens should enjoy this right, and believe it
should be applied consistently. I'm also aware that some do not share my
point of view, and I respect that. My point is about people who invoke the
right to privacy arguement when it supports their position, then conveniently
ignore it when it doesn't; I believe this smoking ban debate is an example of
the latter. Feel free to disagree with me, but please don't change the subject.
Peter Surmak
Linden Hills
More information about the Mpls
mailing list